<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/</link>
	<description>global bioenergy supply chain intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EU: Delegation Strikes Back Against Malaysia and Indonesia Over WTO Threats &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>EU: Delegation Strikes Back Against Malaysia and Indonesia Over WTO Threats &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] Sound familiar? This is akin to the arguments set forth by the corn industry in the United States over California&#8217;s LCFS&#8230;just on an international stage (read Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0?). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sound familiar? This is akin to the arguments set forth by the corn industry in the United States over California&#8217;s LCFS&#8230;just on an international stage (read Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0?). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California: On Biofuels and Implementing Carbon Regulation in a Slumping Economy &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>California: On Biofuels and Implementing Carbon Regulation in a Slumping Economy &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] Low carbon fuels are a key strategy for California, which has already implemented the nation&#8217;s first low carbon fuel standard (see Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0?). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Low carbon fuels are a key strategy for California, which has already implemented the nation&#8217;s first low carbon fuel standard (see Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0?). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truckers Lose Challenge to California Emissions Rule &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Truckers Lose Challenge to California Emissions Rule &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-268</guid>
		<description>[...] could form the basis for a legal argument in favor of California&#8217;s LCFS legal challenges (see Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible With RFS 2.0?), the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. rejected this argument as &#8220;weak,&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could form the basis for a legal argument in favor of California&#8217;s LCFS legal challenges (see Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible With RFS 2.0?), the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. rejected this argument as &#8220;weak,&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California&#8217;s LCFS Works its Way East &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>California&#8217;s LCFS Works its Way East &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-267</guid>
		<description>[...] standard has prompted three lawsuits (here and here) from various industry groups (read Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0? for an in-depth look on the constitutional implications of the law).  At the top of the list are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] standard has prompted three lawsuits (here and here) from various industry groups (read Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0? for an in-depth look on the constitutional implications of the law).  At the top of the list are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biofuel Bandwagon Anything but Green &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Biofuel Bandwagon Anything but Green &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-266</guid>
		<description>[...] while the corn ethanol lobby won critical support under the RFS2, the mandate is limited and emerging low carbon fuel standards should temper excitement within the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while the corn ethanol lobby won critical support under the RFS2, the mandate is limited and emerging low carbon fuel standards should temper excitement within the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reigning in Biomass GHGs: Emerging Life Cycle Obligations &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Reigning in Biomass GHGs: Emerging Life Cycle Obligations &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] mandated GHG accounting system for biofuels.  Along with emerging low carbon fuel standards (see California LCFS), renewable energy firms are increasingly incorporating LCA calculations into their analysis.  As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mandated GHG accounting system for biofuels.  Along with emerging low carbon fuel standards (see California LCFS), renewable energy firms are increasingly incorporating LCA calculations into their analysis.  As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA: Strategies for Restricting Transportation GHG Emissions &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>CA: Strategies for Restricting Transportation GHG Emissions &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-264</guid>
		<description>[...] low carbon fuel standard (see Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0?) reduces the carbon intensity of motor vehicle fuel per unit of energy.  The landmark law aims to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] low carbon fuel standard (see Is California&#8217;s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Compatible with RFS 2.0?) reduces the carbon intensity of motor vehicle fuel per unit of energy.  The landmark law aims to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA: Key Climate Law at Center of Race for Governorship &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>CA: Key Climate Law at Center of Race for Governorship &#124; BIOMASS INTEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-263</guid>
		<description>[...] California has been a pioneer in enacting aggressive environmental laws, including a first-of-its-kind Global Warming Law (AB32).  The law enables the state to take an aggressive approach towards regulating carbon, often setting the benchmark for other states to follow (see low carbon fuel standard). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California has been a pioneer in enacting aggressive environmental laws, including a first-of-its-kind Global Warming Law (AB32).  The law enables the state to take an aggressive approach towards regulating carbon, often setting the benchmark for other states to follow (see low carbon fuel standard). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackinnon Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackinnon Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-262</guid>
		<description>California Auto Transport: thanks for visiting Biomass Intel and for your comment.  Who knows how the policies will shake-out around greenhouse gas emissions regulation, fuel standards, and renewable fuels, but your point is well-taken.  There is a growing consensus that we need to significantly reduce our fossil fuel dependence, which can get sidetracked by climate skeptics.  Like you point out, fuel security concerns and air quality issues should be sufficient drivers for rapidly commercializing carbon-benign renewable fuels.  Low carbon fuel standards are an aggressive tool, but may very well provide robust incentives to stimulate the development of advanced biofuels.

Mackinnon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California Auto Transport: thanks for visiting Biomass Intel and for your comment.  Who knows how the policies will shake-out around greenhouse gas emissions regulation, fuel standards, and renewable fuels, but your point is well-taken.  There is a growing consensus that we need to significantly reduce our fossil fuel dependence, which can get sidetracked by climate skeptics.  Like you point out, fuel security concerns and air quality issues should be sufficient drivers for rapidly commercializing carbon-benign renewable fuels.  Low carbon fuel standards are an aggressive tool, but may very well provide robust incentives to stimulate the development of advanced biofuels.</p>
<p>Mackinnon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Auto Transport</title>
		<link>http://biomasshub.com/is-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard-compatible-with-rfs-2-0/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>California Auto Transport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biomassintel.com/?p=734#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Working in the industry, I figure it is a valid place to voice my opinion on the matter.  Since I work with trucks and cars all day, I am not certain of the science behind what is the best and most ideal solution, but it is sad that so much politics have gotten involved in a matter I think most everyone can agree on.  For those who don&#039;t believe in global warning, I am fine.  I haven&#039;t been to see the polar ice caps myself, not now and not 30 years ago, so it is all possible that it is a big hoax.  However, eliminating that point, the pollution caused can&#039;t be healthy to the people living in the cities or the people, like us, who are in trucks all day for their work.  I hope something can be done to resolve this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working in the industry, I figure it is a valid place to voice my opinion on the matter.  Since I work with trucks and cars all day, I am not certain of the science behind what is the best and most ideal solution, but it is sad that so much politics have gotten involved in a matter I think most everyone can agree on.  For those who don&#8217;t believe in global warning, I am fine.  I haven&#8217;t been to see the polar ice caps myself, not now and not 30 years ago, so it is all possible that it is a big hoax.  However, eliminating that point, the pollution caused can&#8217;t be healthy to the people living in the cities or the people, like us, who are in trucks all day for their work.  I hope something can be done to resolve this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Database Caching 4/12 queries in 0.055 seconds using disk

Served from: biomasshub.com @ 2012-02-10 18:25:00 -->
